Yes, I saw the speculation on AH, and it really is strange to have a 5-octave keyboard if it is not polyphonic in some way.
Seems there's no news on the official Moog site, so....we will have to wait.
It kind of makes me wonder if they are afraid to innovate- this Voyager XL seems to be basically a cobbled-together Voyager with CP-251 and XV-351 boxes, a 5 oct keyboard, and a ribbon. Buy all of that together and you would come in at about $1500 less and have essentially the same thing.
I would think that using the Little Phatty (gawd, I despise that name....!) technology to come up with an analog polysynth would be something more people would be interested in.
Yes, and did you see the post talking about Moog having registered the name 'Slim Phatty', with a functional description of what sounded like a filter bank (or vocoder-type function) with pattern sequencer included?
Well to be honest, this is a weird design. Somehow it doesn't quite look right to me.
I already have a Select Series Voyager, the CP-251 and VX-351 and I am very happy. I don't see how 1500 dollars extra cost can be justified for the Voyager XL. You get 1,5 octaves more, more wood and a couple of things here and there (like more waveforms for the LFO).
Now that's too bad, if anything if I had to do it all over again I would have started with the Voyager OS, I played one at NAMM and enjoyed the immediacy of it that I hadn't experienced since I sold my MiniMoog D back in '82. As it stands, I still have my 2003 Performer after selling off pretty much everything else.
Wheres the turntable and pads....
Are the loops on the lowest or highest octaves...
Can I use the ribbon to chnage the tempo of the sequencer in realtime...
Magnus C350 on a TV Dinner Tray Stand with 2 x PigNose Amps for stereo
If you want "real analog" (which does have its place of course!)
For that much you could get a nice synthesizers.com modular, and be able to do a lot more with it. and buy(or build) lots of other cool modules as needed.
oh but its not moog!